Home
:: Trader Jack's No Nonsense Trading Dictionary
0-9 | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z

 

home | free stock trading articles | add url | tell a friend | contact us | market pivot dates
 

:: ever wondered why markets turn ?

foretelling the future? Or calculating market probabilities? You decide.

back

  NOTE:- "Why Markets Turn" has been registered as a trademark by "Morikawa, Dan", the owner and operator of the website "whymarketsturn.com" on Nov 13th, 2006. This article is nothing to do with either Mr Morikawa, or his astrological software prediction method, and all trademarks are hereby duly acknowledged. To read more about Mr Dan Morikawa and his allegations of 'copyright infringement' aganst this website, click here

Market Turns caused by arbitrage

One theory of market behaviour is the so called 'perfect market' hypothesis. This asserts that the market is perfectly efficient, and that everything there is to know about a stock or other security is accurately represented in that security's price. This theory is essentially correct, except the process suffers from lag. Not all market participants have access to the same information at the same time, and so their understanding of the fair value of a security may be at odds with the understanding of other parties. For example, in the run up to the Twin Towers disaster, it is alleged that certain terrorist groups used legitimate facilities to short those sectors that would be hit hardest by the tradegy, and go long on sectors that would rise from it (they bought gold, for example, always a hedge in times of crisis). The rest of the trading world had little idea about any of this (although some of the more astute market makers may have spotted the movements in those sectors and wondered what the reasons were, reacting automatically even without the full information).

Profit arbitraging

Which brings us to the concept of 'profit arbitrage'. As you will know, the various market participants operate on different timescales, with day traders and the pit itself only holding positions for minutes, swing traders holding a few days, and Warren Buffet holding for 3,000 years. This in itself should cause massive discrepancies in participant belief structures (Billy Daytrader Jr only wants to make half a point before bedtime, Buffet wants a trillion before he dies). So what 'oils the wheels' between these disparate actors in the market? Profit arbitrageurs. There exists a class of market participants who make a living exploiting even tiny differences in other participant's belief structures. A good example of this is the 'Chicago Mob' in the pits at the S&P, who spend all day looking for variations between the price of the big contract and the emini contract. When they spot one, no matter how small, they can place a trade that is effectively riskless - 5 small contracts, after all, should always equal one full size contract. If it doesn't, then sell the overperformer and simultaneously buy the underperformer. Guaranteed profit no matter which way the market moves (before you get excited, you should know that you need to be on the floor for this, with DEEP pockets - we are talking thousands of contracts to make a decent living!)..

Predicting Market Turning Points in the real world

So now you can probably see the various forces that pull and tug the market every which way, and why of necessity it is 50 - 50 whether tomorrow is up or down. Profit arbitargeurs are totally uninterested in market direction, but they exist purely to 'bring it back into line' when they spot even very small misalignments. Their actions (among other things) help ensure the randomness of the day to day moves. But hang on - isn't it possible to construct a trading model that understands all this, and can take account of it? Wouldn't THAT allow us to predict tomorrow's market today? No! So what can we do? Cycle analysis...