Home
:: Trader Jack's No Nonsense Trading Dictionary
0-9 | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z

 

home | free stock trading articles | add url | tell a friend | contact us | market pivot dates
 

:: here's why markets turn

random walk or controlled moves? The role of 'profit arbitrageurs' in why markets turn

back

  NOTE:- "Why Markets Turn" has been registered as a trademark by "Morikawa, Dan", the owner and operator of the website "whymarketsturn.com" on Nov 13th, 2006. This article is nothing to do with either Mr Morikawa, or his astrological software prediction method, and all trademarks are hereby duly acknowledged. To read more about Mr Dan Morikawa and his allegations of 'copyright infringement' aganst this website, click here

Market Turns based on probability

Most traders at some point in their careers spot this '50%' notion and figure out that maybe there is a trading opportunity in it. As they say in casinos, 'the table doesn't remember', but the market, of course, does (well, it does appear to have a short term memory at least!). They then surmise that if, for example, the market DIDN'T turn yesterday, then the chances of it NOT turning today are 50% x 50% i.e. only 25% making what appears to be a good bet. Furthermore, they go on to decide (using spreadsheets, usually!) that if horror of horrors, it doesn't turn today either, then the probability of it not turning tomorrow must be 50% x 50% x 50% i.e. only 12.5% which means (in their opinion!) that there is actually an 87.5% chance that the market WILL turn tomorrow! Good trade or what?! Not!!

Weakness in the probability theory

This game can be played ad infinitum, giving by the 8th day a supposed almost 100% chance of the market doing something particular tomorrow. This is the basis of a number of popular systems, including ebooks promoting this method to the detriment of many trading accounts. The flaw, of course, is obvious. Although the maths may be sound, the likelyhood of coming across a string of outcomes that gives you the chain of days becomes less likely the more days you factor in. So for example, the likelyhood of seeing 3 straight down days in a row is so small that although the 4th day's probability of another down day may very well be 6.25%, the unlikeliness of such a chain occurring in the first place, when multiplied by that 6.25% is... you guessed it... close to 50%. In other words, no matter how you twist the numbers, it is as likely to go one way as 'tother tomorrow.

Predicting Market Turn points

Any sane person will probably agree with the assertion that it is, in fact, impossible to foretell the future, in any area of existence, not just trading. If this wasn't so, whoever had that ability would be able to exploit it very quickly to achieve a total dominance in that particular area (and other areas too, no doubt). Since this doesn't happen (except within the confines of lame 'b' movies) sanity forces us to conclude that the best we can do is construct a range of possibilities about tomorrow, which after all, will be no mean achievement. Websites promoting supposed '100% accurate systems' such as www.whymarketsturn.com should read on! More...